🔗 Share this article

A decade following the UK entered into a rushed public vote that split the country and unleashed turmoil, a advisory is issued from across the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and citizens entered unwittingly Brexit and the same could occur with a national vote on a unified Ireland, initiating convulsions for which nobody is prepared.

That represents the warning from two respected writers from each side of the Irish border who have teamed up to analyse the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland departing the UK to establish a new state with the Republic of Ireland.

Governmental Institutions Not Ready

The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are extremely unready for a possibly fraught and seismic referendum.

"The lesson of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that stuff can come out of the blue and can build support swiftly," the commentator said. "I would suggest that the governmental framework of our region remains very unstable."

New Title Seeks to Stir Debate

The pair have examined the governmental, financial and societal rationales for any constitutional change in a publication, For and Against a United Ireland, released by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They aim to stir debate on the matter with a roadshow of speaking events that will take them to Westminster early next month.

"What haunts everybody, or must worry everybody, is the Brexit vote of 2016," said the analyst.

"We do not want a national vote on a thumbs up-thumbs down, ambiguous question whose implications have not been clarified because then you find yourself with an highly polarised community where people who have lost are resistant to defeat and the those successful are uncertain exactly what it is that they have achieved."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland official should call a public vote on Irish unity if it seems probable that a most voters would approve.

Sinn Féin and other nationalists claim that moment is imminent, and a group called Ireland’s Future has garnered backing, but both governments and unionists minimise the possibility, resulting in ambiguity if and when there will be a national vote.

Absence of Serious Debate

Ideological statements supporting and opposing unification has hidden the absence of substantive discussion, noted the journalist.

"Individuals are often for or against the concept but the detailed consideration which may surpass that to achieve it is mostly absent. Much has gone on in academia but hardly any politicians or campaigners seek to involve themselves even with the fundamentals. To illustrate, what type of nation would you want? Centralised? Decentralised?"

Volume's Strategy

In the publication, none of the commentators endorses unification or the current situation. Both composes two pieces that seek objectivity in detailing the case for a unified Ireland and the case against, marshalling economic and social data, previous instances and governmental frameworks.

Discussions range over identity markers, levies, medical care, pensions, public liabilities and the threat of loyalist violence. The goal is to enlighten and encourage conversation.

"There's huge interest in the topic but there has not yet occurred a debate," said O’Toole. "Discussion indicates an recognition of the notion that there may exist valid points on both sides."

Dual Referendums

A referendum in Northern Ireland would also trigger one in the Republic of Ireland, where citizens say they support unification but refuse greater financial contributions or implementing a alternative symbol to acknowledge pro-UK communities' British culture.

"The Irish government should work out what the offer from Irish nationalism is aside from just stating: 'We want a united Ireland and we love you'," stated the commentator.

Possibility of Referendum

McBride thinks a national vote in his generation is likely and that it might occur unexpectedly. "It is possible just a reckless or a ill-advised or a incompetent official who states: 'Let us proceed and get it out of the way.'"

Both nationalists and pro-UK supporters have credible, justified points, he commented. "One side will succeed on this issue and somebody will eventually not succeed but each side has has important lessons to gain from the opposing viewpoints."

Call for Broader Discussion

Westminster needed to join the debate, said O’Toole. "This concerns Britain. It is a British question equally as it is an Irish matter."